Saturday, March 31, 2012

Friday, March 30, 2012

Let me Understand this?

The future of Health Care in this country ( Which by the way every civilized country has but ours) ) is in the hands of Nine people on Federal Health Care.
If that isn't the definition of what our politics has become I don't know what is?
And for all you who abhor socialism show some courage and vote against social security.
By the way when you are on Social Security you must purchase Medicare or show you enough money to cover your own medical costs? So how is this different? Just asking?

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Apple and Arizona

No one will ever truly know why Apple decided to build a new plant in Texas, and not in Arizona employing 1300 people, but here is my guess.
The publicity this state gets with Sheriff Joe " the toughest sheriff in America" the law you can carry guns into bars, "heads on the border " Governor Brewer, and of course the " right to work" policy that wins every job contest OH! except this one.
What happened don't those corporations know about our " right to work " laws.
Boeing did that is why they moved to North Carolina, and according to everyone in the know that trumps everything, well I guess not, other things matter. Like sanity!

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Supreme Court Fallacy

Is there any doubt after watching the clearly political decision in Bush Vs. Gore that the Supreme Court is "blind and impartial" when it comes to decisions???

I lost a lot of faith when Bush vs Gore was decided by who appointed them.

No way 9 justices can read the same thing and vote clearly their party choice and believe that was a coincidence.

. But it happened, who among us thinks this health care isn't going to go the same way.

In the end tho it might be a good thing a bill over two thousand pages can't be good, and am I to understand it doesn't apply to Nebraska?

Politics STINK

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Southern GOP Views on Evolution

Why would anyone want to associate with that bunch?

Monday, March 5, 2012

Boy Rush messed up.

Rush Limbaugh, who I listen to many days, really messed up. 

This stupid woman, who had the audacity to ask, whine, sorry... "bitch" that she needed her birth control paid for because it was just too expensive, started the most important conversation we can engender if we are to save ourselves from becoming Greece.  What should society pay for?

That, even my Liberal brethren must agree, is the crux of the matter of what in large part separates us.

So to be clear, my best answer is not much....or as little as possible...what ever ones finds most palatable.  Should we have one group pay for another?  Is that your answer? 

Now we are not going to agree on this, Terry for instance, is a unabashed liberal who never wants to refuse anyone anything, but we can disagree and argue would lose.

Most voters realize that we are going broke promising more than we have, in fact we are giving to this generation benefits not from others (the rich) but from future generations ($15 trillion, debt = 100% GDP)

But Rush, who is funny, but gives himself more credit for political analysis than he deserves  (has not mentioned that...hey, as we have discussed Sanatorium's religion...who benefited most...Romney!)  really screwed up by changing this important discussion to...slut.   F-ck...were were on the verge of an important discussion of what society should pay for and now we are...see below....which has nothing to do with the topic of concern....shit.


The Republican crusade to limit access to birth control for women across the country took an ugly turn last week. As our Republican colleagues continued their effort to extend the reach of the government into the bedroom, most of them stood silently by while one of their favorite radio personalities launched a despicable, sexually charged attack on a respectable young woman. If this is what passes for family values in Republican circles these days, things in the Grand Ol' Party have indeed come to a sorry pass.

It is a certainty that their efforts, if successful, will have a damaging effect on women's health. Make no mistake -- though the headlines have been about birth control, the issue here is women's health.
Birth control is directly and undeniably related to women's health. Birth control protects women from the risk of bearing children before they are ready. Birth control helps to ensure that women do not bear too many children or bear children too soon after their last pregnancy. Birth control is used to relieve symptoms of endometriosis, regulate a cycle, reduce acne, relieve symptoms of depression, reduce migraines, treat polycystic ovary condition, alleviate anemia, and even reduce the risk of some cancers.

:“It’s a sign of the emotions wrapped up in the global warming debate that Gleick should be apologizing for his actions today while the Heartland Institute stakes out the moral high ground.”

You dipshit's are stupid.  and immoral, don't think through things.

Pollution happens...I don't want pollution, you don't want pollution, but perhaps we could talk...and have a reasonable conversation...but dipshits want to state, without a doubt that there is global warming, sorry, climate change, because it is said so....OK, well things in science are not said so...just not...don't care if a thousand scientists agree...there is no consensus, there can't Capitalism, science is best when left to explore, to argue, to naturally determine the winners and losers.  But no, Al Gore made famous the most erroneous statement in scientific history..."this is settled science"...Al, there is no settled science, there is theory and law, climate change, which began as global warming is at best a theory, and Al/Rich's,..... theory's don't need convincing nor are they "settled science"

The fraud of the Climate change community is amazing, if they were drug companies doing the same, you would be at their door with pitchforks.  

Let's discuss if you wish, but I'm going to retreat into my scientific certainly of the unknowable if you persist in being a dipshit.


If the theory of man-made global warming were such a self-obvious truth, the result of scientific consensus, then why do advocates for this idea keep committing frauds to advance it? Even more disturbing, why are some writers willing to defend this behavior?
The latest embarrassment for global-warming activists came on Feb. 20 after Peter Gleick, founder of the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security in Oakland, admitted that he committed fraud to obtain documents he thought would embarrass a conservative think tank that has been a leading debunker of some of the overheated claims of the climate-change Chicken Littles.
The memos, which reveal the group’s political and fund-raising strategies, provided little to embarrass the Chicago-based Heartland Institute, but it has damaged the reputation of a man who was a respected intellectual in the environmental world. Gleick, a MacArthur Foundation “genius” fellow, doesn’t seem brilliant now, as he takes a leave of absence from the institute, faces public embarrassment and possible prosecution. (Heartland claims that one memo was fabricated, although Gleick denies that charge, but the scandal could get uglier.)
But even after Gleick admitted and apologized for his action,Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik defended him:“It’s a sign of the emotions wrapped up in the global warming debate that Gleick should be apologizing for his actions today while the Heartland Institute stakes out the moral high ground.”