Sunday, June 7, 2009
Saturday, June 6, 2009
"O"
Mark, my brother, though you may disagree and dislike (yes dislike the sanctimonious "O") as much as I do, it seems many are willing to give the "O" a chance.
However...
Sooner or later the Bush derangement syndrome excuse is going to pass, and he will be left holding the bag, with North Korea and Iran slapping his outreached hand (as expected) and the economy hitting the crapper from the achievers of this country going on strike (tax avoidance instead of producing and earning) and it remaining so after the illusion of the stimulus passes (instead of business tax cuts which would already have taken affect and stimulated the economy) and the massive accumulating debt (which will in no way be reversed by a limited tax on high earners, instead requiring huge taxes on almost all) and even after the huge tax increases, it will not pay the debt (receipts are down $100 billion in April) so he will need to monetize the debt making our credit worthless.
And then healthcare rationing.
After all that... he is going to get his ass kicked.
However...
Sooner or later the Bush derangement syndrome excuse is going to pass, and he will be left holding the bag, with North Korea and Iran slapping his outreached hand (as expected) and the economy hitting the crapper from the achievers of this country going on strike (tax avoidance instead of producing and earning) and it remaining so after the illusion of the stimulus passes (instead of business tax cuts which would already have taken affect and stimulated the economy) and the massive accumulating debt (which will in no way be reversed by a limited tax on high earners, instead requiring huge taxes on almost all) and even after the huge tax increases, it will not pay the debt (receipts are down $100 billion in April) so he will need to monetize the debt making our credit worthless.
And then healthcare rationing.
After all that... he is going to get his ass kicked.
Barry believes murdering an late tterm abortionist is much worse than murdering soldiers on US soil
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/06/obama_quietly_issues_statement_1.asp
The White House blasted a statement to reporters via email about five hours after news broke that third-trimester abortionist George Tiller was murdered on Sunday:
"I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence."
After two days of silence, President Obama issued a statement Wednesday on the shooting of two U.S. soldiers by a Muslim militant in Arkansas--but the White House didn't even email the statement to its list of national reporters. Rather, the White House appears to have quietly released this statement to a local AP bureau in Arkansas.
"I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe. I would like to wish Quinton Ezeagwula a speedy recovery, and to offer my condolences and prayers to William Long's family as they mourn the loss of their son."
Writes McCormack: "The contrast between Obama's statements is striking: He's 'deeply saddened' by the murder of a U.S. soldier, but 'shocked and outraged' by the murder of an abortionist? The murder of a U.S. soldier is a 'senseless' act of violence but the murder of an abortionist is a 'heinous' act of violence?"
I don't know about the rest of you but I believe they are both terrible acts that deserve at least the same amount of coverage and outrage.
I also believe that the murder of Tiller is an isolated incident that will not have any follow up murders but that the murder of the soldiers by a US born Muslim convert has much longer lasting implications for our future as a nation. How long before we have our first suicide bomber killing either a large number of Jewish worshipers or a larger group of military targets on US soil? For Barry to rate one much worse than the other shows us truly at what level his mind works and it is not an encouraging one as far as the future of our national security goes. I would definitely label this as an Islamic Extremist act of terror on US soil. More to follow you can bet on that!
The White House blasted a statement to reporters via email about five hours after news broke that third-trimester abortionist George Tiller was murdered on Sunday:
"I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence."
After two days of silence, President Obama issued a statement Wednesday on the shooting of two U.S. soldiers by a Muslim militant in Arkansas--but the White House didn't even email the statement to its list of national reporters. Rather, the White House appears to have quietly released this statement to a local AP bureau in Arkansas.
"I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe. I would like to wish Quinton Ezeagwula a speedy recovery, and to offer my condolences and prayers to William Long's family as they mourn the loss of their son."
Writes McCormack: "The contrast between Obama's statements is striking: He's 'deeply saddened' by the murder of a U.S. soldier, but 'shocked and outraged' by the murder of an abortionist? The murder of a U.S. soldier is a 'senseless' act of violence but the murder of an abortionist is a 'heinous' act of violence?"
I don't know about the rest of you but I believe they are both terrible acts that deserve at least the same amount of coverage and outrage.
I also believe that the murder of Tiller is an isolated incident that will not have any follow up murders but that the murder of the soldiers by a US born Muslim convert has much longer lasting implications for our future as a nation. How long before we have our first suicide bomber killing either a large number of Jewish worshipers or a larger group of military targets on US soil? For Barry to rate one much worse than the other shows us truly at what level his mind works and it is not an encouraging one as far as the future of our national security goes. I would definitely label this as an Islamic Extremist act of terror on US soil. More to follow you can bet on that!
Friday, June 5, 2009
Remember who the enemy is and what they are like
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Al-Qaeda-Beheads-Edwin-Dyer-In-North-Africa---Terror-Group-Wanted-Cleric-Abu-Qatada-Released/Article/200906115294414?f=rss
Next time you left wing liberal weeneies are soiling yourselves crying and singing Kumbia over the waterboarding of three self admitted Al Qaeda terrorists refer to this story again and think about how weak they think you are over your whining about harsh interrogation techniques. Please tell me again how we have made these blood thirsty heathans who worship the Koran more wacko than they already were. Also please show me the actual factual proof that shows that Gitmo helped to recruit more terrorists. Since there is none and this line is just another left wing talking point with no basis in reality you will not be able to.
You left wing individuals who read this blog please tell me if you had a choice between getting waterboarded after you committed heinous acts or being a tourist and getting caught by some fun loving, misunderstood Al Qaeda types who think it is justified to seperate your head from your body, which situation would you choose?
Denise Miller said it best, "we need to find all of these islamic fundamentalist wackos and end their lives immediately". That is what they would do to you if given the chance, no questions asked. You don't even need to be an enemy combatant carrying a weapon on the battlefield.
Another example why liberalism is definitely a mental disorder. Some times you have to fight fire with fire. Maybe if we beheaded these Gitmo detainees instead of giving them better living conditions than what they had before they were captured we might really win this war against Islamic Radicals. I know we would get their undivided attention. They certainly would not go back to being terrorists after being released like so many already have.
Just another classic Barry blunder that is causing his once might popularity to keep moving south. Close that gitmo down. That is what we have to do. It will surely make us all safer.
Next time you left wing liberal weeneies are soiling yourselves crying and singing Kumbia over the waterboarding of three self admitted Al Qaeda terrorists refer to this story again and think about how weak they think you are over your whining about harsh interrogation techniques. Please tell me again how we have made these blood thirsty heathans who worship the Koran more wacko than they already were. Also please show me the actual factual proof that shows that Gitmo helped to recruit more terrorists. Since there is none and this line is just another left wing talking point with no basis in reality you will not be able to.
You left wing individuals who read this blog please tell me if you had a choice between getting waterboarded after you committed heinous acts or being a tourist and getting caught by some fun loving, misunderstood Al Qaeda types who think it is justified to seperate your head from your body, which situation would you choose?
Denise Miller said it best, "we need to find all of these islamic fundamentalist wackos and end their lives immediately". That is what they would do to you if given the chance, no questions asked. You don't even need to be an enemy combatant carrying a weapon on the battlefield.
Another example why liberalism is definitely a mental disorder. Some times you have to fight fire with fire. Maybe if we beheaded these Gitmo detainees instead of giving them better living conditions than what they had before they were captured we might really win this war against Islamic Radicals. I know we would get their undivided attention. They certainly would not go back to being terrorists after being released like so many already have.
Just another classic Barry blunder that is causing his once might popularity to keep moving south. Close that gitmo down. That is what we have to do. It will surely make us all safer.
Another lie confirmed by our POTUS
Remember when Barry first shook King Abdullah's hand? There was all the fuss about the fact that Barry bowed. Of course Barry's people denied it and claimed he was just stooping due to his height. Well we all know for sure that this was a big lie since the photos of Barry's most recent trip to Saudi Arabia show him shaking King Abdullah's hand and easily not having to stoop to look him in the eyes.
Just another example of the constant BS coming out of this administration. It also shows that Barry hates to admit a mistake or that he has changed his mind. Witness how he wriggles when he is asked about adopting the Bush administration policies that he criticized so much during the election. The handshake kerfuffle is a minor but characteristic reminder that in Barry's case, actions speak louder than words.
This is the buffoon that goes around the world apologizing for past US actions where no apology is necessary yet he can't even admit to the fact that he originally bowed when he first met King Abdullah.
What arrogance!
Just another example of the constant BS coming out of this administration. It also shows that Barry hates to admit a mistake or that he has changed his mind. Witness how he wriggles when he is asked about adopting the Bush administration policies that he criticized so much during the election. The handshake kerfuffle is a minor but characteristic reminder that in Barry's case, actions speak louder than words.
This is the buffoon that goes around the world apologizing for past US actions where no apology is necessary yet he can't even admit to the fact that he originally bowed when he first met King Abdullah.
What arrogance!
Another place where Obama has beaten Bush
The latest poll from Rasmussen is out and among likely voters the number that strongly disapproves of his job performance now equals the number who strongly approve his performance. Both are at 34%. In January the spread was 45% strongly approve and 13% strongly disapprove. So he has managed to fall from a positive spread of 32% to zero in less than 6 months. And this is with the fawning press giving him an unprecedented amount of slanted favorable coverage. He has fallen much faster than President Bush did. Given this latest speech in Cairo I predict that he will go negative in the very near future.
Please explain this one Rich since according to you he has done nothing but good things that we should all be proud of. He keeps falling at this rate and we will have impeachment hearings run by his own party.
Please explain this one Rich since according to you he has done nothing but good things that we should all be proud of. He keeps falling at this rate and we will have impeachment hearings run by his own party.
Words have meaning
So our current POTUS has stated that the US is not a Christian nation. He then went on to talk about his Muslim roots, which were off limits during the election. He also went on to say the the US is one of the largest Muslim nations. Huh! Not even close. Where does he get his information from? This guy is really out of control. There are many more Jews than Muslims in the US. Why didn't he add that into his latest trip on the apologypalooza tour? He could truthfully say that we are one of the largest Jewish nations.
He then goes on to say that Iran should be allowed to pursue peaceful uses of nuclear power. Yea sure that is what they are doing. They are sitting on a large lake of oil and they need nuclear power. Why is it that Iran can have nuclear power but the US cannot build any more nuclear power plants? Don't you find this a little ironic? Especially given the fact that they now have an estimated 5,000 centrifuges. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090605/wl_nm/us_nuclear_iaea_iran
If Barry Hussein believes that they only want nuclear power plants than he should be impeached today.
With North Korea and Iran testing Barry on a daily basis I can honestly say that the world is far less safe since he took office. It appears that they view him as being without cojones. No wonder, given the way he has been going around begging for forgiveness for the US and it's past actions, as if we have something to be sorry for. This is what we get when we are stupid enough to elect a "blame America first" radical liberal. We need to impeach him before he does too much destruction.
Michelle Obama gave us a true view into their collective brain when she made the statement about being proud of being an American for the first time. When we have a President that views this beacon of freedom that he was chosen to lead as the problem rather than the solution you have a dangerous precedence that does not bode well for this nation's future. All he is doing is pouring gasoline on a fire.
He then goes on to say that Iran should be allowed to pursue peaceful uses of nuclear power. Yea sure that is what they are doing. They are sitting on a large lake of oil and they need nuclear power. Why is it that Iran can have nuclear power but the US cannot build any more nuclear power plants? Don't you find this a little ironic? Especially given the fact that they now have an estimated 5,000 centrifuges. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090605/wl_nm/us_nuclear_iaea_iran
If Barry Hussein believes that they only want nuclear power plants than he should be impeached today.
With North Korea and Iran testing Barry on a daily basis I can honestly say that the world is far less safe since he took office. It appears that they view him as being without cojones. No wonder, given the way he has been going around begging for forgiveness for the US and it's past actions, as if we have something to be sorry for. This is what we get when we are stupid enough to elect a "blame America first" radical liberal. We need to impeach him before he does too much destruction.
Michelle Obama gave us a true view into their collective brain when she made the statement about being proud of being an American for the first time. When we have a President that views this beacon of freedom that he was chosen to lead as the problem rather than the solution you have a dangerous precedence that does not bode well for this nation's future. All he is doing is pouring gasoline on a fire.
Thursday, June 4, 2009
IBD
In his biography of Milton Friedman, Lanny Ebenstein quotes the Nobel laureate economist: "If taxes are raised in order to keep down the deficit, the result is likely to be a higher norm for government spending. Deficits will again mount and the process will be repeated."
With the benifit of 42 years, the only thing we should add to this insight is "will be" in place of Friedman's "is likely to" when it comes to higher spending levels.
Budget projections only reinforce that point. At the end of last year, the Congressional Budget Office ran projections well into the baby boomers' retirement.
CBO assumed on the revenue side that none of the 2001 tax cuts continued beyond their 2010 expiration and the AMT's ensnarement of middle class went unmitigated.
As the table shows, by 2050, revenues reach 23.5% of GDP. On the spending side, CBO assumed not only that would there be no new spending, but that health care's skyrocketing rate would somehow be curtailed. Even so, federal spending reaches 28.1%of GDP.
Even under an egregiously aggressive tax system and optimistically parsimonious spending assumptions, revenues still can't keep pace. Lack of revenues is not the problem now, and it will not be the problem in the future.
With the benifit of 42 years, the only thing we should add to this insight is "will be" in place of Friedman's "is likely to" when it comes to higher spending levels.
Budget projections only reinforce that point. At the end of last year, the Congressional Budget Office ran projections well into the baby boomers' retirement.
CBO assumed on the revenue side that none of the 2001 tax cuts continued beyond their 2010 expiration and the AMT's ensnarement of middle class went unmitigated.
As the table shows, by 2050, revenues reach 23.5% of GDP. On the spending side, CBO assumed not only that would there be no new spending, but that health care's skyrocketing rate would somehow be curtailed. Even so, federal spending reaches 28.1%of GDP.
Even under an egregiously aggressive tax system and optimistically parsimonious spending assumptions, revenues still can't keep pace. Lack of revenues is not the problem now, and it will not be the problem in the future.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Exactly!
You can attack the author all you wish, but the fact and conclusions are true (and in fact are what I/We have been saying all along).
Happy trails "O"
What's Keeping Obama Up?By Dick Morris
The Rasmussen poll conducted over the weekend of May 30-31 asked a key question designed to give us perspective on Obama's current popularity. The question was whether the current problems "are due to the recession that began under the Bush administration or to the policies Obama has put in place since taking office." In other words, who's to blame, Bush or Obama?
Happy trails "O"
What's Keeping Obama Up?By Dick Morris
The Rasmussen poll conducted over the weekend of May 30-31 asked a key question designed to give us perspective on Obama's current popularity. The question was whether the current problems "are due to the recession that began under the Bush administration or to the policies Obama has put in place since taking office." In other words, who's to blame, Bush or Obama?
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
What is wrong with some of the radical liberals that they would issue death threats over this?
http://thedartmouth.com/2009/06/01/news/youngcons
Liberals must be spending too much time wishing they were radical Islamists issuing fatwahs. Issuing death threats to these college students for this. Some people need to really take a pill!
Liberals must be spending too much time wishing they were radical Islamists issuing fatwahs. Issuing death threats to these college students for this. Some people need to really take a pill!
Cheney
"I think freedom means freedom for everyone," Cheney said. "As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay, something that we've lived with for a long time in our family."Cheney's daughter. Today he said gay couples should have "any kind of arrangement they wish." "I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish, any kind of arrangement they wish," he said, adding that regulations on marriage have traditionally been handled at the state level rather than the federal level, and should remain in states' jurisdictions. "Different states will make different decisions and I don't have problem with that."
Monday, June 1, 2009
we told you so
Following an opinion piece from the former Democratic Presidential candidate.
Now that the left is in charge, we are free to reduce spending on the one true legitimate function of government.
Also and more importantly note, he does not want to give the savings back to the people, instead preferring to plow the money into expanding our "Socialist" government. In fact, thinking about it in more depth, I find it amazing that it did not even cross his mind.
Now don't get us Conservatives wrong. We are all for efficiency and minimalist government and there is probably a lot, lot, of fat in the defence budget, but why not just give it back to the people or pay off the debt? But no...., we need to use it to expand the size and scope of that which reduces our freedom.
Lastly, Afghanistan? Pull out? I thought even the liberals understood that we cannot leave the breeding ground of 9/11. How long to the "O" lied and kept us in Afghanistan and people died?
Now that the left is in charge, we are free to reduce spending on the one true legitimate function of government.
Also and more importantly note, he does not want to give the savings back to the people, instead preferring to plow the money into expanding our "Socialist" government. In fact, thinking about it in more depth, I find it amazing that it did not even cross his mind.
Now don't get us Conservatives wrong. We are all for efficiency and minimalist government and there is probably a lot, lot, of fat in the defence budget, but why not just give it back to the people or pay off the debt? But no...., we need to use it to expand the size and scope of that which reduces our freedom.
Lastly, Afghanistan? Pull out? I thought even the liberals understood that we cannot leave the breeding ground of 9/11. How long to the "O" lied and kept us in Afghanistan and people died?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)