SHABAZZ: I hate white people. All of them! Every last iota of a cracker, I hate him! You want freedom? You're going to have to kill some crackers! You're going to have kill some of their babies.
What would cause this person to be so filled with hate? Who gets the credit?
This country has gone through a distant war, a past recognition of rights to arrive at a mostly a color blind society. The young of this county, the vast majority, no longer see race; you can see it by looking at their friends and their values. Prejudice is a badge of shame in our society.
Conservative only want a equal society, equal opportunity, we do not believe in "social justice" which is just another way to say redistribution.
So how was this fool created? Where? Under what system of belief?
Entitlement? Class warfare? Race baiting? Those are not the signatures of my, conservative, belief system.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Why is anyone racist? The whole topic of Shabazz is obviously race baiting. I suspect his views are a legacy of slavery.
Unfortunately, Jim, not all conservatives are as enlightened as you. The GOP geographical base is the south - the same region of the country that tried to succeed from our nation 150 years ago in a futile attempt to maintain and grow slavery.
Rush Limbaugh - de facto leader of the GOP - has been making racist comments lately in a clear (and unsuccessful) attempt to draw Obama into direct argument. He said that Obama would not have been elected president nor would Oprah have been so successful if not black. Its incredible - somehow he thinks being black is an advantage in 2010 America. I guess that is why all of our preceding presidents were white men.
Keep it up boys - the race baiters are going to create a country where Republicans can't get elected anywhere but in the whitest of districts. Ask President Pete Wilson how well it worked using race as a wedge issue.
Amazing! You can look at those words and attribute them to slavery? Something not present for over 150 years.
Not an entitlement mentality, not race baiting? Slavery.
You can't even consider that, gosh, perhaps the Democratic class warfare machine caused a perpetuation of non deserved anger?
You don't GET that fools such as this perpetuate prejudice, perpetuate hate and result in long standing misery, caused by this hate, in the very ones he so professes to defend.
You don't GET that the slavery is to the welfare state? You don't GET that?
Do you GET that Black unemployment remains high, as does percentage in prison?
So you think that slavery from 150 years ago continues to oppress and cause this man's hate? It does not even cross your mind that perhaps he has been sold (taught) a pack of lies by those OF HIS RACE AND YOUR LIBERAL BELIEF SYSTEM which causes him to waste his life's energy on such hatred.
Wow
The Hardball Gang Doesn't Like to Hear the Truth About Obama
July 9, 2010
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: This is Hardball last night. Chris Matthews is beside himself with all the truth-telling on this show, all the truth that we are telling about Obama. He had Pat Buchanan on last night. Matthews says, "Does this sound right, what Limbaugh is saying, that this is getting even for whites' success, the white America he hates deep in his soul, the reason he ran for president was to bring it down? Is this a reasonable argument by anybody?" Now, Matthews is misstating what I've said in his question. What I've said is I'm simply taking the words of a Department of Justice lawyer who repeated it to a line attorney, J. Christian Adams, who said not prosecuting the New Black Panthers is payback. What can that possibly mean? It's payback. We're not going to go after black defendants. It's payback time. You know, I said the O.J. Simpson verdict was payback time, and everybody on the left is outraged, "Why would you say that? How can you possibly say that?" What do you call it? Jury nullification. How long did that trial take and the jury is out for a couple minutes, and they come back, not guilty?
There's no question it was jury nullification. They said we're going to find this guy not guilty for whatever reason so you all can figure out what it's like. You know, we've been falsely convicted and falsely accused ever since this country was founded so how does it feel? And at the time, hardly anybody disputed that analysis of the jury's verdict in O.J. Jury nullification. The evidence didn't matter. We're going to say he didn't do it so you can find out what it feels like. Well, if you're intellectually honest with yourself and you look at these policies, there's no way. Obama said, "The days of this country leading the world are over." He's apologized for this country every foreign trip he's made. He clearly has a chip on his shoulder about this country. He's redistributing the wealth of this country. He's returning the wealth of this nation to its, quote, unquote, rightful owners. They are miserable. I mean nobody's happy with his policies. They're a miserable failure everywhere.
His preacher, Reverend Wright, maybe my problem is I'm too willing to admit what I hear is what I hear. You people on the left, you heard Jeremiah Wright, you know who Bill Ayers is, you know that Obama was in that church for 20 years, you know he heard what the guy said. You know he gave a half-baked denouncement of the guy during the campaign. You know Frank Marshall Davis, an avowed communist raised him. You know his father was a communist. You know he's got a bugaboo about this country. You know he doesn't like the Bill of Rights. We've had him on tape, the Constitution's Bill of Rights is a set of negative liberties. It does not tell the government what it can do to people. They don't like the first Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Third Amendment, the Fourth Amendment. They want a revised second Bill of Rights that can tell the government what it can do. The Constitution constrains Obama, Chris. He said this. Maybe my problem is I listen. So I listen to him say these things, I listen to what his best friends say, I look at their rage and anger, I look at the anti-capitalist policies of every appointee and every czar, I look at what happens, and then I look at the implementation of his economic policies to create jobs and economic growth, and it's doing just the opposite.
I listen to all these private sector business titans now starting to say, "You know what? These policies are horrible, they're not working, and they won't work." And I simply connect the dots. Well, then why have they been implemented? They've been implemented by somebody who, by the way, is happily presiding over the decline of the United States, and people in the regime have used that term, the decline of the country. This country was wrong in Iraq, it was wrong in Hiroshima, it was wrong everywhere it's been, to these people. You people on the left, you may not all dislike this country. You have to admit a sizeable contingent of your movement does dislike this country, and some of them actually hate it. All I'm saying is for the first time in my lifetime we have elected a president who does not think anything good of this country, that somehow it's been unjust and immoral and he's gotta fix it. Like Krauthammer just said, here's a guy who believes in his own magnificence but not his country's. I mean it is what it is. Maybe my flaw is believing it. Maybe my flaw is just not letting it go in one other, out the other. So Matthews asks Buchanan, essentially, "Is this the reason the guy ran for president, to bring down the country, is that a viable thing to say?"
BUCHANAN: No, if you say that he ran for president to bring down America, no. But if you say that Barack Obama is really not the type of, if you will, gut patriot say Jack Kennedy was, Ronald Reagan was, who would tear up at stories about American heroism, I think Obama does believe America is guilty of a lot of sins in its history, Chris. I think he is somewhat different than almost all the presidents we have ever had.
RUSH: Well, now, then, Pat, why did you say no, if you say he ran for president to bring down America? And then everything else you say agrees with me. He said, "He's not really the type of gut patriot that Kennedy was or Reagan was, tear up at stories about American heroism. I think Obama does believe America's guilty of a lot of sins in its history. I think he's somehow different than almost all the presidents we've ever had." Yeah. Somehow different than all of the presidents we've ever had? Yes, and in what way? Buchanan just described it. So after this Q&A, Matthews then played a montage of Rush comments from the past few weeks. Now, he plays this montage as though what I'm saying is beyond the pale, it's simply outrageous. But you've heard these things because you listen to the program. They aired last night on Mess NBC. Everything I say here is true, and yet those on the left hear this and they think it's racism or sexism or whatever ism they want to call it.
RUSH ARCHIVE (montage): (June 22,2010) I think Obama loves drilling moratoriums. I think he loves getting even with this country. I think he loves punishing this country. I think he adores the opportunity to cut this country down to size. Obama was part of the Democrat Party cabal hoping for defeat in Iraq. (June 28, 2010) ...is appointing people to the Supreme Court to vote down the Constitution. (June 30, 2010) First president in history, to my knowledge anyway, who actually wants his nation to fail. (July 1, 2010) Obama wants to create an illegal alien Bill of Rights. (July 2, 2010) We're now governed by people who do not like the country. Who is Obama? Why is he doing this? Why? Why? (July 6, 2010) He wouldn't have been voted president if he weren't black.
RUSH: And that's what set them off, and then the line where I said if he weren't black, he'd be a tour guide in Hawaii. Man, you ought to see the smoldering embers that were Democrat websites over that comment. And as usual what sets 'em off is the truth. What sets them off is the truth. Here's Eugene Robinson calling all this racist claptrap. Matthews says, "Limbaugh clearly has a pattern here of saying just what he said the other day, Gene, which is the president wants America to fail out of revenge."
ROBINSON: This is racist claptrap. This is nonsense. I don't believe Rush Limbaugh actually believes half of the stuff that he said. Barack Obama wants to create an illegal alien Bill of Rights, Barack Obama's proposal for a comprehensive immigration bill falls far short of the amnesty that Ronald Reagan gave to illegal immigrants. If he believes half of this, I would be stunned. I think this is all about Rush Limbaugh's fat bank account and the fact that by saying increasingly outrageous and inflammatory and, yes, racist things about Barack Obama, it stirs the waters and then makes everybody talk about him and makes people listen to him.
RUSH: Okay, so there is the learned analysis of what I'm saying. I don't really mean it. That was Eugene Robinson, a columnist for the Washington Post. He said, "Barack Obama (gasp) wants to create (gasp) an illegal alien Bill of Rights (gasp)." Well, yeah. Amnesty is the largest voter registration drive we've ever had in this country. If you are going to oppose the enforcement of federal immigration law, why is it incorrect to say that we are creating an illegal alien Bill of Rights? "Barack Obama's proposal for a comprehensive immigration bill falls far short of the amnesty that Reagan gave to illegal immigrants." Those two are not even comparable, what Reagan did and what Obama seeks to do? Reagan would never sue a state. Reagan would never encourage a boycott of one state by other states, as this regime has done. So now, in order to deal with this truth that I utter, they now tell themselves I don't really mean it. It's just to fatten my bank account. Well, he-he-he-he-he, you don't see my name listed on all those companies hoarding cash, but, he-he.
I'll tell you something else is patently obvious. Eugene Robinson, Chris Matthews, whoever it is, you guys really need a new talking point. Calling everybody who criticizes or disagrees with Obama a racist is just not cutting it anymore. You've try to discredit all of us who disagree with Obama by claiming we're all racists. It isn't going to cut it because you have all kinds of people now who are as critical of this regime and its policies as I have been before the regime was immaculated. Now, does anybody ever ask if Hugo Chavez realizes what he's doing to his country? No, they don't. They don't ask that, because everybody knows that Hugo Chavez is a socialist. The media reports I read about Chavez, there's hardly any criticism. It just, "Here's the facts. Chavez is nationalizing the oil business because there's an energy shortage. Chavez is rationing food. Chavez, the socialist leader of Venezuela, is doing this, this, and this."
There's never any criticism of it. There's just reporting. Nobody ever asks, "Gosh, does this guy know what he's doing?" So why would anybody ask, "Does Obama know what he's doing?" Of course he knows what he's doing! This is not an accident, and he's peppered and populated his administration with like-minded zombies. Cut-outs. Rubber stamps. A marvel. You know, Van Jones is being exposed and people ask, "How did that guy get in there?" He's handpicked precisely because of what he believes, and say, "Ehhhh, Obama, you know, he's got a immigration plan that's not nearly as comprehensive as Ronald Reagan's was." Come on. Are we idiots? Do you really think that we're idiots? Do you want to tell us that Obama's immigration desires, his "comprehensive immigration reform" is in any way less sweeping than Reagan's?
You really want us to believe that Reagan was more radical on immigration than Barack Obama? You see, we all know, amnesty or "comprehensive immigration reform" is nothing but voter registration. In fact, more and more people now are starting to see it. Now, I'm reading people who are now beginning to criticize Obama for a "political miscalculation." They're saying, "Well, it is apparently obvious, Obama is trying to gain support of Hispanic voters for the November elections via his immigration policy." Okay, true. There's no question. But can we complete the sentence and point out how absolutely devious that is, to sell the country and a particular state down the river in order to secure a voting bloc? And you want to compare that to Ronald Reagan?
RUSH: Has there ever, ever been a greater illustration of me being on the cutting edge of societal, political and cultural stuff that happen all of this that's happening now? Since before Obama was inaugurated, I have been saying X, Y, and Z about what he was going to do and how it wasn't gonna work because of what and who he is. And now, a year and a half later, here comes the chorus -- slowly but surely building -- and they're all agreeing with me. This is exactly what I mean when I say, "I'm on the cutting edge of societal, cultural, political evolution." You are listening to it, and that's why you listen to this program.
Alert! It appears that Mel Gibson has gotten hold of Jim Ganem's account information and is posting ignorant rants under his name!
Seriously, tbough. In the late '80's I attended a convention of hotel owners & execs in Seattle and was seated at the same table as the chair of the GOP in Louisiana. When the conversation moved to politics, he was shocked and a little aggravated that a "White guy with a good job" could be a Democrat. When I told him that I thought that Republicans in the south remained fundamentally racist he told me I was right and the Democrats were too and "It would never change." He was comfortable saying this across a table of 8 as we were entertained by Marvin Hamlish and Roberta Flack.
Jim, these things do not change in a few generations. Our parents were born closer in time to slavery than today. In our lifetime the now solid Republican south had institutional segregation in place with the lopsided support of the people. These attitudes are handed down from generation to generation in a manner similar to religious affiliation.
So - in this instance you are obviously the race baiter bringing up the topic of Shabazz - generally and in particular in the context of your post.
No - I do not believe that liberal anything contributed to the angry racist views of your subject. Wow.
Post a Comment