I was going to post the following as a response to crazy Rich, but it turned out so well, I thought... hey! Let's make all the lefties crazy.

This global warming thing..shouldn't there be like, you know, global warming?

Shouldn't China and India be included?

Doesn't it sound "fishy", that they are not? Is there a White House web site to report them?

Shouldn't there be a history of successful prediction of past "climate changes"?

Shouldn't there be further debate, given that beyond physical and chemical laws, there is no true "settled science"?

Shouldn't the folks who most strongly support reducing greenhouse gasses be willing to reduce their consumption, allow windmills in their view and support nuclear power?

Shouldn't a party, mind set or whatever we want to call it, that has a history of hostility to business and the successful be viewed with suspicion when they propose a dramatic change in our way of life on the basis of a theory that has not predicted what has happened and conveniently only includes "developed" country's.

If a benefit of such a proposal, even if the reason for the proposal was not true, was reduced foreign demand for oil, shouldn't we open up all our resources including a small postage sized area in Alaska and far out areas off our coast?

Shouldn't folks who emotionalize the management of livestock, throw blood on those who wear material not to their liking, clog our courts with spurious suits over minor species (basically to retard growth) not be trusted to give objective evidence about a scientific theory and instead should be viewed to be as they always are, agents against growth, success and Capitalism.

I don't know about Global Warming and I am for a clean environment but I do know that the left cannot be trusted and the best way to protect our environment is as it always is, through freedom and free markets. (Terry should be rushing to the hospital now after a severe gagging attack).